Fair Use Notice

FAIR USE NOTICE

A BEAR MARKET ECONOMICS BLOG


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates
FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates

All Blogs licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Another cause of California's drought: Pot farms

                mother 

mnn    nature

                network




These farms in the wilderness soak up a tremendous amount of water, especially at the peak of summer.

Photo: Don DeBold/Flickr
California's ongoing drought has been blamed on a lot of different factors, ranging from climate change to over consumption to the agricultural industry. But here's one more factor that may be draining California dry: marijuana farms. These farms – some legal, most not – soak up a tremendous amount of water in the wilderness. At summer's peak, each plant can soak up about six gallons of water a day, according to a recent report from McClatchy DC. It's so bad in some regions, particularly California's North Coast, that important fish populations are suffering.

Illegal pot farms in Northern California have already been linked to extensive wildlife deaths, as the farms are often protected with rat bait. This has even affected federally protected endangered species. (California banned the sale of rat poison last month to help protect wildlife.)

All of these problems are compounded by the fact that many pot farms are situated, illegally, on public land. "Those are lands that you and I own," Congressman Mike Thompson told McClatchy. "And when people are growing dope there and guarding their operations with guns and the likes, and sometimes with booby traps, we can't use the land that we own. It happens all over."

Other pot farms are apparently being set up in secret on land belonging to traditional farmers. "[Pot] grows hidden in trees on someone else's farm have become more and more common over the past two years," an undercover drug agent told KCRA in February. The National Guard reported that these illegal growers put pumps, dams and irrigation tubing on the sites, diverting water from the farmers' canals. These illegal sites also use pesticides, which end up in the water, sometimes in wells intended for drinking.

None of this is new, of course. Marijuana plots were blamed for diverting hundreds of millions of gallons of water during California's 2009 drought.

The marijuana industry, perhaps not surprisingly, says it is being scapegoated. "It's really easy to point fingers at a very large cash crop that's completely unregulated," Emerald Growers Association founding Chairwoman Kristen Nevedal told McClatchy. "It's one of the main cash crops of the state." Marijuana sales are projected to reach nearly $1 billion in California in 2014.

That number could actually be hard to predict: the California drought is predicted to tighten marijuana supplies and drive up pot prices around the country.

Veteran journalist Dan Rather recently looked into the problem of pot farming in California. You can see the first part of his report in the video below:

Sunday, April 20, 2014

24 Mind-Blowing Facts About Marijuana Production in America

Mother Jones


The only thing green about that bud is its chlorophyll.



You thought your pot came from environmentally conscious hippies? Think again. The way marijuana is grown in America, it turns out, is anything but sustainable and organic. Check out these mind-blowing stats, and while you're at it, read Josh Harkinson's feature story, "The Landscape-Scarring, Energy-Sucking, Wildlife-Killing Reality of Pot Farming."

Nationwide grows

California seized

Trespass grows

San Francisco water

Indoor crop

Refrigerators

California electricity

Power plants

Carbon dioxide

Car emissions

Single joint
Sources: Jon Gettman (2006), US Forest Service (California outdoor grow stats include small portions of Oregon and Nevada), Office of National Drug Control Policy, SF Public Utilities Commission, Evan Mills (2012).
UPDATE: Beau Kilmer of the RAND Drug Policy Research Center argues that the government estimates of domestic marijuana production used in this piece and many others are in fact too high. Kilmer's research,published last week, suggests that total US marijuana consumption in 2010 (including pot from Mexico) was somewhere between 9.2 and 18.5 million pounds.

Thursday, April 17, 2014

Even Casual Marijuana Use Causes Brain Abnormalities

Motherboard

 

Even Casual Marijuana Use Causes Brain Abnormalities 



Even Casual Marijuana Use Causes Brain Abnormalities






April 15, 2014 // 06:15 PM EST

Image: Shutterstock
Even casually smoking marijuana can cause abnormalities in the developing brain, according to the results of a new study funded by the National Institutes of Health.

High-resolution MRI scans of the brains of adults between the ages of 18-25 who reported smoking weed at least once a week were structurally different than a control group: They showed greater grey matter density in the left amygdala, an area of the brain associated with addiction and showed alterations in the hypothalamus and subcallosal cortex. The study also notes that marijuana use “may be associated with a disruption of neural organization.” The more weed a person reported smoking, the more altered their brain appeared, according to the Northwestern University and Harvard Medical School study, which was published in the Journal of Neuroscience.

The finding already has the study’s authors calling for states to reconsider legalizing the drug. Hans Breiter, the lead author, said he’s “developed a severe worry about whether we should be allowing anybody under age 30 to use pot unless they have a terminal illness and need it for pain.”

Previous marijuana studies have shown brain abnormalities in chronic users and in teens, but the researchers say this is the first time that there are structural differences between recreational users and those who don’t smoke weed. The study says that the parts of the brain altered have been associated with schizophrenia, Parkinson’s disease, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and Tourette’s syndrome. 

The study suggests that “pending confirmation in other cohorts of marijuana users, the present findings suggest that further study of marijuana effects are needed to help inform discussion about the legalization of marijuana.”

The veracity of the study’s findings comes down to how you define “recreational.” Though none of the users were “addicted” to weed (the researchers’ words, not mine, so take up your “weed is not addictive" battle with them), most of them smoked pot fairly regularly. On average, those studied smoked weed about 4 days a week, smoked 11 joints a week, had regularly smoked weed for about six years, and had started when they were about 16. 
It's the first study that has found these brain abnormalities in casual users (previous mice studies have had similar results), but it's just another study in the proverbial garden of them. It further muddles what legalization is getting at: Is weed good or bad (or, beyond that—should adults be able to decide if they want to do it anyway)?

Take, for instance, the news that NIH director Francis Collins said there is now a scientific basis for the fact that weed often eases anxiety. So, weed is good. Then, later in his blog post, he suggested that “frequent or heavy marijuana use among adolescents should be a cause of major concern.” So, weed is bad.

The fact that Colorado is raking in far more tax money from legal weed than it originally expected (good!) and hasn’t seen any disastrous things happen (good!) has certainly piqued the interest of other states looking to cash in on the crop. Now there's this study (bad!). Whether it has any impact on legalization efforts around the country remains to be seen, but it certainly doesn’t help the cause. 
Topics: Study Says, marijuana, weed, drugs, nih, discoveries